RUTGERS MATHEMATICS DEPARTMENT COLLOQUIUM

sponsored by the

Rutgers University
Department of Mathematics

Co-organizers:
Vladimir Retakh (retakh {at} math [dot] rutgers [dot] edu)
Anthony Zaleski (az202 {at} math [dot] rutgers [dot] edu)



Forthcoming Talks

Unless otherwise specified, talks will be held in Hill 705 on the date indicated from 4 to 5 PM. Talks may not be held every week.


Previous Talks

For previous talks, see the archive page




Spring 2017

Date: February 17
Speaker: Lenhard Ng (Duke)
Title: Studying knots through symplectic geometry and cotangent bundles
Abstract:

Symplectic geometry has recently emerged as a key tool in the study of low-dimensional topology. One approach, championed by Arnol'd, is to examine the topology of a smooth manifold through the symplectic geometry of its cotangent bundle, building on the familiar concept of phase space from classical mechanics. I'll focus on one particular application of this approach that yields strong invariants of knots. I'll discuss a mysterious connection between these knot invariants and string theory, as well as a recent result (joint with Tobias Ekholm and Vivek Shende) that the invariants completely determine the underlying knot.




Date: February 24
Speaker: Richard Schwartz (Brown)
Title: 5 points on the sphere
Abstract:

Thomson's problem, which goes back to 1904, asks how N points will arrange themselves on the sphere so as to minimize their electrostatic potential. A more general problem asks what happens for other power law potentials. In spite of quite a bit of experimental evidence accumulated over the past century, and some spectacular results for values of N associated with highly symmetric polyhedra, there have been few rigorous results for the modest case N=5. In my talk I will explain my recent proof that, for N=5, the triangular bi-pyramid is the minimizer with respect to all power laws up to a constant S=15.04808..., and then the minimizer changes to a pyramid with square base. My talk will have some nice computer animations.




Date: March 3
Speaker: Tim Austin (Courant)
Title:
Abstract:




Date: March 10 2:00pm
Speaker: Jean Bricmont (Univ. Catholique de Louvain)
Title: What is the meaning of the wave function?
Abstract: In quantum mechanics, the wave function or the quantum state has a perfectly well defined meaning as an instrument to predict results of measurements. But what does it mean outside of measurements? To this question, no clear answer is given in quantum mechanics textbooks. We will first give a naive interpretation of what the wave function could mean outside of measurements and show that it is mathematically inconsistent. Then, we will briefly explain how the de Broglie-Bohm theory solves that problem.




Date: March 17
Spring Break


Date: March 24
Speaker: Lauren Williams (Berkeley)
Title: From hopping particles to Macdonald-Koornwinder polynomials
Abstract:

The asymmetric simple exclusion process (ASEP) is a Markov chain describing particles hopping on a 1-dimensional finite lattice. Particles can enter and exit the lattice at the left and right boundaries, and particles can hop left and right in the lattice, subject to the condition that there can be at most one particle per site. The ASEP has been cited as a model for traffic flow, protein synthesis, the nuclear pore complex, etc. In my talk I will discuss joint work with Corteel and with Corteel-Mandelshtam, in which we describe the stationary distribution of the ASEP and the 2-species ASEP using staircase tableaux and rhombic tilings. I will also discuss the link between these models and Askey-Wilson polynomials and Macdonald-Koornwinder polynomials.




Date: March 31
Speaker: Mohammed Abouzaid (Columbia)
Title: Symplectic topology, mirror symmetry, and rigid analytic geometry
Abstract:

Strominger, Yau, and Zaslow proposed a geometric explanation for mirror symmetry via a dualization procedure relating symplectic manifolds equipped with Lagrangian torus fibration with complex manifolds equipped with totally real torus fibrations. By considering the family of symplectic manifolds obtained by rescaling the symplectic form, one obtains a degenerating family of complex manifolds, which is expected to be the mirror.

Because of convergence problems with Floer theoretic constructions, it is difficult to make this procedure completely rigorous. Kontsevich and Soibelman thus proposed to consider the mirror as a rigid analytic space, defined over the field C((t)), equipped with the non-archimedean t-adic valuation, or more generally over the Novikov field. This is natural because the Floer theory of a symplectic manifold is defined over the Novikov field.

After explaining this background, I will give some indication of the tools that enter in the proof of homological mirror symmetry in the simplest class of examples which arise from these considerations, namely Lagrangian torus fibrations without singularities.




Date: April 7
Speaker: Denis Auroux (Berkeley)
Title:
Abstract:




Date: April 14
Speaker: François Treves (Rutgers)
Title:
Abstract:




Date: April 21
Speaker: Jeremy Kahn (Brown)
Title:
Abstract:




Date: April 28
Speaker: Tobias Colding (MIT)
Title:
Abstract:







This page is maintained by Anthony Zaleski.