RUTGERS UNIVERSITY STUDENT INSTRUCTIONAL RATING FORM Summer 04
01 640 428 B1 83500 WEININGER NICHOLAS
ENROLL= 023 RESP= 14 STRONGLY STRONGLY # OF MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN
DISAGREE NEUTRAL AGREE NO OF OF OF OF
PART A: UNIVERSITY-WIDE QUESTIONS: 1 2 3 4 5 RESPONSES SECTION COURSE DEPT 200 LEVEL
1. The instructor was prepared for class and
presented the material in an organized manner 0 1 0 2 11 0 4.64 4.64 4.52 4.65
2. The instructor responded effectively to
student comments and questions 0 0 3 3 8 0 4.36 4.36 4.42 4.54
3. The instructor generated interest in the
course material 0 1 0 5 8 0 4.43 4.43 4.15 4.22
4. The instructor had a positive attitude toward
assisting all students in understanding
course material 0 0 3 3 8 0 4.36 4.36 4.51 4.50
5. The instructor assigned grades fairly 1 2 2 2 7 0 3.86 3.86 4.34 3.61
6. The instructional methods encouraged
student learning 0 2 3 4 5 0 3.86 3.86 4.11 3.92
7. I learned a great deal in this course 0 0 5 4 5 0 4.00 4.00 4.12 4.14
8. I had a strong prior interest in the subject
matter and wanted to take this course 0 1 5 6 2 0 3.64 3.64 3.06 3.38
POOR EXCELLENT
9. I rate the teaching effectiveness of
the instructor as 0 1 2 2 9 0 4.36 4.36 4.35 4.39
10. I rate the overall quality of the course as 0 0 3 4 7 0 4.29 4.29 4.06 4.19
PART B: QUESTIONS ADDED BY DEPARTMENT OR INSTRUCTOR:
11. 0 0 0 0 0 14 0.00 4.00 3.88 4.44
12. 0 0 0 0 0 14 0.00 5.00 4.11 5.00
13. 0 0 0 0 0 14 0.00 5.00 4.19 5.00
14. 0 0 0 0 0 14 0.00 5.00 4.32 5.00
15. 0 0 0 0 0 14 0.00 5.00 4.29 5.00
16. 0 0 0 0 0 14 0.00 5.00 4.19 5.00
17. 0 0 0 0 0 14 0.00 5.00 4.20 5.00
18. 0 0 0 0 0 14 0.00 5.00 4.18 5.00
19. 0 0 0 0 0 14 0.00 5.00 4.06 5.00
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY STUDENT INSTRUCTIONAL RATING FORM FALL 03
01 640 251 07 24945 WEININGER N
ENROLL= 026 RESP= 14 STRONGLY STRONGLY # OF MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN
DISAGREE NEUTRAL AGREE NO OF OF OF OF
PART A: UNIVERSITY-WIDE QUESTIONS: 1 2 3 4 5 RESPONSES SECTION COURSE DEPT 200 LEVEL
1. The instructor was prepared for class and
presented the material in an organized manner 1 0 0 1 12 0 4.64 4.30 4.22 4.42
2. The instructor responded effectively to
student comments and questions 1 0 0 3 10 0 4.50 4.23 4.06 4.31
3. The instructor generated interest in the
course material 1 0 4 5 4 0 3.79 3.85 3.82 3.96
4. The instructor had a positive attitude toward
assisting all students in understanding
course material 1 1 0 2 10 0 4.36 4.32 4.18 4.38
5. The instructor assigned grades fairly 0 1 0 7 6 0 4.29 4.28 4.13 4.33
6. The instructional methods encouraged
student learning 0 0 4 2 8 0 4.29 3.86 3.74 3.97
7. I learned a great deal in this course 0 0 2 4 8 0 4.43 3.99 3.70 4.08
8. I had a strong prior interest in the subject
matter and wanted to take this course 3 1 3 5 2 0 3.14 3.68 3.08 3.72
POOR EXCELLENT
9. I rate the teaching effectiveness of
the instructor as 0 0 1 3 10 0 4.64 4.10 3.93 4.20
10. I rate the overall quality of the course as 0 0 3 6 5 0 4.14 3.82 3.69 3.97
PART B: QUESTIONS ADDED BY DEPARTMENT OR INSTRUCTOR:
11. 0 0 0 0 0 14 0.00 4.00 3.88 4.44
12. 0 0 0 0 0 14 0.00 5.00 4.11 5.00
13. 0 0 0 0 0 14 0.00 5.00 4.19 5.00
14. 0 0 0 0 0 14 0.00 5.00 4.32 5.00
15. 0 0 0 0 0 14 0.00 5.00 4.29 5.00
16. 0 0 0 0 0 14 0.00 5.00 4.19 5.00
17. 0 0 0 0 0 14 0.00 5.00 4.20 5.00
18. 0 0 0 0 0 14 0.00 5.00 4.18 5.00
19. 0 0 0 0 0 14 0.00 5.00 4.06 5.00
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY STUDENT INSTRUCTIONAL RATING FORM FALL 03
01 640 251 08 25972 WEININGER N
ENROLL= 030 RESP= 20 STRONGLY STRONGLY # OF MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN
DISAGREE NEUTRAL AGREE NO OF OF OF OF
PART A: UNIVERSITY-WIDE QUESTIONS: 1 2 3 4 5 RESPONSES SECTION COURSE DEPT 200 LEVEL
1. The instructor was prepared for class and
presented the material in an organized manner 0 0 0 5 15 0 4.75 4.30 4.22 4.42
2. The instructor responded effectively to
student comments and questions 0 0 0 4 16 0 4.80 4.23 4.06 4.31
3. The instructor generated interest in the
course material 0 0 0 9 11 0 4.55 3.85 3.82 3.96
4. The instructor had a positive attitude toward
assisting all students in understanding
course material 0 0 0 3 17 0 4.85 4.32 4.18 4.38
5. The instructor assigned grades fairly 1 0 0 5 14 0 4.55 4.28 4.13 4.33
6. The instructional methods encouraged
student learning 0 0 1 10 9 0 4.40 3.86 3.74 3.97
7. I learned a great deal in this course 0 1 2 7 10 0 4.30 3.99 3.70 4.08
8. I had a strong prior interest in the subject
matter and wanted to take this course 0 0 5 7 8 0 4.15 3.68 3.08 3.72
POOR EXCELLENT
9. I rate the teaching effectiveness of
the instructor as 0 0 0 4 16 0 4.80 4.10 3.93 4.20
10. I rate the overall quality of the course as 0 1 0 10 9 0 4.35 3.82 3.69 3.97
PART B: QUESTIONS ADDED BY DEPARTMENT OR INSTRUCTOR:
11. 0 0 0 0 0 20 0.00 4.00 3.88 4.44
12. 0 0 0 0 0 20 0.00 5.00 4.11 5.00
13. 0 0 0 0 0 20 0.00 5.00 4.19 5.00
14. 0 0 0 0 0 20 0.00 5.00 4.32 5.00
15. 0 0 0 0 0 20 0.00 5.00 4.29 5.00
16. 0 0 0 0 0 20 0.00 5.00 4.19 5.00
17. 0 0 0 0 0 20 0.00 5.00 4.20 5.00
18. 0 0 0 0 0 20 0.00 5.00 4.18 5.00
19. 0 0 0 0 0 20 0.00 5.00 4.06 5.00
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY STUDENT INSTRUCTIONAL RATING FORM FALL 03
01 640 251 09 28193 WEININGER N
ENROLL= 032 RESP= 22 STRONGLY STRONGLY # OF MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN
DISAGREE NEUTRAL AGREE NO OF OF OF OF
PART A: UNIVERSITY-WIDE QUESTIONS: 1 2 3 4 5 RESPONSES SECTION COURSE DEPT 200 LEVEL
1. The instructor was prepared for class and
presented the material in an organized manner 0 0 0 3 19 0 4.86 4.30 4.22 4.42
2. The instructor responded effectively to
student comments and questions 0 0 0 2 20 0 4.91 4.23 4.06 4.31
3. The instructor generated interest in the
course material 0 0 4 4 14 0 4.45 3.85 3.82 3.96
4. The instructor had a positive attitude toward
assisting all students in understanding
course material 0 0 0 3 19 0 4.86 4.32 4.18 4.38
5. The instructor assigned grades fairly 0 0 0 5 17 0 4.77 4.28 4.13 4.33
6. The instructional methods encouraged
student learning 0 0 2 6 14 0 4.55 3.86 3.74 3.97
7. I learned a great deal in this course 0 1 2 10 9 0 4.23 3.99 3.70 4.08
8. I had a strong prior interest in the subject
matter and wanted to take this course 1 0 9 4 8 0 3.82 3.68 3.08 3.72
POOR EXCELLENT
9. I rate the teaching effectiveness of
the instructor as 0 0 1 4 17 0 4.73 4.10 3.93 4.20
10. I rate the overall quality of the course as 0 0 3 9 9 1 4.29 3.82 3.69 3.97
PART B: QUESTIONS ADDED BY DEPARTMENT OR INSTRUCTOR:
11. 0 0 0 0 0 22 0.00 4.00 3.88 4.44
12. 0 0 0 0 0 22 0.00 5.00 4.11 5.00
13. 0 0 0 0 0 22 0.00 5.00 4.19 5.00
14. 0 0 0 0 0 22 0.00 5.00 4.32 5.00
15. 0 0 0 0 0 22 0.00 5.00 4.29 5.00
16. 0 0 0 0 0 22 0.00 5.00 4.19 5.00
17. 0 0 0 0 0 22 0.00 5.00 4.20 5.00
18. 0 0 0 0 0 22 0.00 5.00 4.18 5.00
19. 0 0 0 0 0 22 0.00 5.00 4.06 5.00
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY STUDENT INSTRUCTIONAL RATING FORM Summer 03
01 640 244 C1 90663 WEININGER N
ENROLL= 024 RESP= 9 STRONGLY STRONGLY # OF MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN
DISAGREE NEUTRAL AGREE NO OF OF OF OF
PART A: UNIVERSITY-WIDE QUESTIONS: 1 2 3 4 5 RESPONSES SECTION COURSE DEPT 200 LEVEL
1. The instructor was prepared for class and
presented the material in an organized manner 0 0 0 1 8 0 4.89 4.62 4.55 4.43
2. The instructor responded effectively to
student comments and questions 0 0 0 1 8 0 4.89 4.60 4.36 4.25
3. The instructor generated interest in the
course material 0 1 1 1 6 0 4.33 4.30 4.20 4.04
4. The instructor had a positive attitude toward
assisting all students in understanding
course material 0 0 0 1 8 0 4.89 4.368 4.46 4.42
5. The instructor assigned grades fairly 0 0 0 3 6 0 4.67 3.79 4.26 4.02
6. The instructional methods encouraged
student learning 0 1 0 2 6 0 4.44 4.27 4.12 3.93
7. I learned a great deal in this course 0 0 1 0 7 1 4.75 4.31 4.17 4.04
8. I had a strong prior interest in the subject
matter and wanted to take this course 1 0 1 2 4 1 4.00 3.11 3.09 3.45
POOR EXCELLENT
9. I rate the teaching effectiveness of
the instructor as 0 0 1 1 7 0 4.67 4.47 4.30 4.13
10. I rate the overall quality of the course as 0 1 1 1 6 0 4.33 3.90 4.02 3.96
PART B: QUESTIONS ADDED BY DEPARTMENT OR INSTRUCTOR:
11. 0 0 0 0 0 9 0.00 4.00 3.88 4.44
12. 0 0 0 0 0 9 0.00 5.00 4.11 5.00
13. 0 0 0 0 0 9 0.00 5.00 4.19 5.00
14. 0 0 0 0 0 9 0.00 5.00 4.32 5.00
15. 0 0 0 0 0 9 0.00 5.00 4.29 5.00
16. 0 0 0 0 0 9 0.00 5.00 4.19 5.00
17. 0 0 0 0 0 9 0.00 5.00 4.20 5.00
18. 0 0 0 0 0 9 0.00 5.00 4.18 5.00
19. 0 0 0 0 0 9 0.00 5.00 4.06 5.00
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY STUDENT INSTRUCTIONAL RATING FORM Fall 02
01 640 135 17 05766 WEININGER N
ENROLL= 033 RESP= 17 STRONGLY STRONGLY # OF MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN
DISAGREE NEUTRAL AGREE NO OF OF OF OF
PART A: UNIVERSITY-WIDE QUESTIONS: 1 2 3 4 5 RESPONSES SECTION COURSE DEPT 100 LEVEL
1. The instructor was prepared for class and
presented the material in an organized manner 0 1 0 7 9 0 4.41 4.23 4.24 4.20
2. The instructor responded effectively to
student comments and questions 0 1 0 7 9 0 4.41 4.07 4.05 3.99
3. The instructor generated interest in the
course material 1 2 2 4 8 0 3.94 3.84 3.81 3.76
4. The instructor had a positive attitude toward
assisting all students in understanding
course material 0 0 2 6 9 0 4.41 4.26 4.19 4.16
5. The instructor assigned grades fairly 1 1 3 5 5 2 3.80 4.21 4.11 4.10
6. The instructional methods encouraged
student learning 1 0 6 8 2 0 3.59 3.74 3.72 3.66
7. I learned a great deal in this course 2 2 4 9 0 0 3.18 3.69 3.67 3.62
8. I had a strong prior interest in the subject
matter and wanted to take this course 2 1 9 5 0 0 3.00 3.16 3.07 3.05
POOR EXCELLENT
9. I rate the teaching effectiveness of
the instructor as 0 0 4 6 7 0 4.18 3.93 3.92 3.86
10. I rate the overall quality of the course as 1 1 5 10 0 0 3.41 3.74 3.70 3.65
PART B: QUESTIONS ADDED BY DEPARTMENT OR INSTRUCTOR:
11. 0 0 0 0 0 17 0.00 4.23 3.64 3.43
12. 0 0 0 0 0 17 0.00 4.17 4.11 4.04
13. 0 0 0 0 0 17 0.00 4.23 3.87 3.76
14. 0 0 0 0 0 17 0.00 4.23 3.85 3.69
15. 0 0 0 0 0 17 0.00 4.17 4.04 3.93
16. 0 0 0 0 0 17 0.00 4.00 4.13 4.02
17. 0 0 0 0 0 17 0.00 4.00 4.27 4.14
18. 0 0 0 0 0 17 0.00 4.00 4.19 4.05
19. 0 0 0 0 0 17 0.00 4.20 4.11 3.95
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY STUDENT INSTRUCTIONAL RATING FORM Fall 02
01 640 135 18 05767 WEININGER N
ENROLL= 034 RESP= 10 STRONGLY STRONGLY # OF MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN
DISAGREE NEUTRAL AGREE NO OF OF OF OF
PART A: UNIVERSITY-WIDE QUESTIONS: 1 2 3 4 5 RESPONSES SECTION COURSE DEPT 100 LEVEL
1. The instructor was prepared for class and
presented the material in an organized manner 0 0 0 3 6 1 4.67 4.23 4.24 4.20
2. The instructor responded effectively to
student comments and questions 0 0 0 5 4 1 4.44 4.07 4.05 3.99
3. The instructor generated interest in the
course material 0 0 1 2 7 0 4.60 3.84 3.81 3.76
4. The instructor had a positive attitude toward
assisting all students in understanding
course material 0 0 0 4 6 0 4.60 4.26 4.19 4.16
5. The instructor assigned grades fairly 0 0 0 3 6 1 4.67 4.21 4.11 4.10
6. The instructional methods encouraged
student learning 0 0 2 5 3 0 4.10 3.74 3.72 3.66
7. I learned a great deal in this course 0 0 3 3 4 0 4.10 3.69 3.67 3.62
8. I had a strong prior interest in the subject
matter and wanted to take this course 0 1 6 1 2 0 3.40 3.16 3.07 3.05
POOR EXCELLENT
9. I rate the teaching effectiveness of
the instructor as 0 0 1 5 3 1 4.22 3.93 3.92 3.86
10. I rate the overall quality of the course as 0 0 3 4 2 1 3.89 3.74 3.70 3.65
PART B: QUESTIONS ADDED BY DEPARTMENT OR INSTRUCTOR:
11. 0 0 0 0 0 10 0.00 4.23 3.64 3.43
12. 0 0 0 0 0 10 0.00 4.17 4.11 4.04
13. 0 0 0 0 0 10 0.00 4.23 3.87 3.76
14. 0 0 0 0 0 10 0.00 4.23 3.85 3.69
15. 0 0 0 0 0 10 0.00 4.17 4.04 3.93
16. 0 0 0 0 0 10 0.00 4.00 4.13 4.02
17. 0 0 0 0 0 10 0.00 4.00 4.27 4.14
18. 0 0 0 0 0 10 0.00 4.00 4.19 4.05
19. 0 0 0 0 0 10 0.00 4.20 4.11 3.95
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY STUDENT INSTRUCTIONAL RATING FORM Fall 02
01 640 115 14 00518 WEININGER N
ENROLL= 034 RESP= 13 STRONGLY STRONGLY # OF MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN
DISAGREE NEUTRAL AGREE NO OF OF OF OF
PART A: UNIVERSITY-WIDE QUESTIONS: 1 2 3 4 5 RESPONSES SECTION COURSE DEPT 100 LEVEL
1. The instructor was prepared for class and
presented the material in an organized manner 1 2 4 3 3 0 3.38 4.17 4.24 4.20
2. The instructor responded effectively to
student comments and questions 2 3 5 3 0 0 2.69 3.93 4.05 3.99
3. The instructor generated interest in the
course material 2 4 4 2 1 0 2.69 3.67 3.81 3.76
4. The instructor had a positive attitude toward
assisting all students in understanding
course material 0 0 5 7 1 0 3.69 4.05 4.19 4.16
5. The instructor assigned grades fairly 1 2 3 4 3 0 3.46 4.07 4.11 4.10
6. The instructional methods encouraged
student learning 3 4 5 0 0 1 2.17 3.59 3.72 3.66
7. I learned a great deal in this course 4 4 2 3 0 0 2.31 3.54 3.67 3.62
8. I had a strong prior interest in the subject
matter and wanted to take this course 3 1 6 1 2 0 2.85 2.82 3.07 3.05
POOR EXCELLENT
9. I rate the teaching effectiveness of
the instructor as 2 5 4 2 0 0 2.46 3.77 3.92 3.86
10. I rate the overall quality of the course as 3 4 2 3 1 0 2.62 3.50 3.70 3.65
PART B: QUESTIONS ADDED BY DEPARTMENT OR INSTRUCTOR:
11. 0 0 0 0 0 13 0.00 4.30 3.64 3.43
12. 0 0 0 0 0 13 0.00 4.17 4.11 4.04
13. 0 0 0 0 0 13 0.00 4.33 3.87 3.76
14. 0 0 0 0 0 13 0.00 4.17 3.85 3.69
15. 0 0 0 0 0 13 0.00 4.33 4.04 3.93
16. 0 0 0 0 0 13 0.00 4.17 4.13 4.02
17. 0 0 0 0 0 13 0.00 4.17 4.27 4.14
18. 0 0 0 0 0 13 0.00 4.00 4.19 4.05
19. 0 0 0 0 0 13 0.00 2.33 4.11 3.95