(z + x)!
                              H := --------------
                                   (2 x + z + 1)!

                                 2
                       ((z + x)!)
             Using, -----------------, as a kernel for Zeta(, 2, ),
                                    2
                    ((2 x + z + 1)!)

       The best delta amongst the Potential Function of the corresponding

              MWZ pair , followed by the pair [n,k], for n+k=40 is

-.12971507674121465768595230206328576624159821893026223363236852781890087908\
    193633085296515719241368046750090393789435923411784546998363724130131705\

    251880157891862834417627440241467558211503725625886765, [11, 29]

                    This took , 10.880, seconds of CPU time

                                 3
                       ((z + x)!)
             Using, -----------------, as a kernel for Zeta(, 3, ),
                                    3
                    ((2 x + z + 1)!)

       The best delta amongst the Potential Function of the corresponding

              MWZ pair , followed by the pair [n,k], for n+k=40 is

-.13045837906722331806021584994994457176259460837688339431741460608336498868\
    515396064455247380179215340535026193285972068518596357213251343215047647\

    763536733592846296838577252698643761205237887595642064, [14, 26]

                    This took , 112.940, seconds of CPU time

                                 4
                       ((z + x)!)
             Using, -----------------, as a kernel for Zeta(, 4, ),
                                    4
                    ((2 x + z + 1)!)

       The best delta amongst the Potential Function of the corresponding

              MWZ pair , followed by the pair [n,k], for n+k=40 is

-.23018022657775595201854573819697373136009678921279900949763095428480663269\
    273236652742900326814054838769764682331386864247169533882266640331922930\

    828836635882317273312499888575974805075509431507534688, [2, 38]

                    This took , 21.750, seconds of CPU time

                                 5
                       ((z + x)!)
             Using, -----------------, as a kernel for Zeta(, 5, ),
                                    5
                    ((2 x + z + 1)!)

       The best delta amongst the Potential Function of the corresponding

              MWZ pair , followed by the pair [n,k], for n+k=40 is

-.28474887473437381754346639438992712021662036657279553850637382499873067972\
    547567617274024679377269635186749806464245967873521811547576871048844039\

    172763312369369481050089791636404550102747669137584217, [2, 38]

                    This took , 179.300, seconds of CPU time

                                 6
                       ((z + x)!)
             Using, -----------------, as a kernel for Zeta(, 6, ),
                                    6
                    ((2 x + z + 1)!)

       The best delta amongst the Potential Function of the corresponding

              MWZ pair , followed by the pair [n,k], for n+k=40 is

-.34991112261873746282339339887028047825999669967056321872454572660275374816\
    169321353329234906297212445048770787993183277897830572384296379823474007\

    873011319244606465996137317245702039239020835785049384, [16, 24]

                    This took , 110.970, seconds of CPU time